SPACE AND TIME REGULARIZED NAVIER–STOKES EQUATIONS
Nondissipative Space-Time Regularizations for the ICON Model
The regularized continuous problem
The time regularization
The space regularization
Numerical experiments
Selected bibliography
The regularized continuous problem
The traditional approach in numerical modeling is
- define the continuous problem;
- provide a numerical discretization for such problem.
In our case, however, an intermediate step is introduced:
- define the continuous problem;
- define a regularized version of the
continuous problem;
- discretize the regularized version of the continuous problem.
In a general sense, the regularization step is introduced to obtain a
problem which is more suitable for the numerical discretization
compared to the original continuous problem.
We are currently
investigating two types of regularizations, aiming at two independent
goals. The time regularization improves the efficiency of the
numerical discretization by enlarging the stable time step, thus
representing an alternative to the semi-implicit method, while the
space regularization modifies the energy and enstrophy
cascade toward small scales, thus representing an alternative to the
usual (dissipative) turbulence closures.
Both the time and the space
regularizations are nondissipative, since they do not enhance
the viscosity of the system.
The time regularization
In the time regularization, a regularized pressure field is
introduced in order to slow down the velocity of the fastest, acoustic
waves. This results in a significant increase of the stable time step
for an explicit time integration method, thus improving the efficiency
of the overall numerical computation.
For the special case of the shallow water equations the regularized
system reads
where v is the fluid velocity, f is the Coriolis
parameter, g is the gravitational constant and h is the
free surface elevation. The regularized free surface height is
obtained from
where &tau is a constant characterizing the regularization and
depending on the time step.
A more detailed description of the time regularized system can be
found in[
8
9
10
11].
The space regularization
In the space regularization, a regularized velocity field is
introduced in order to reduce the energy and enstrophy cascade toward
small wave numbers. The resulting equation set has been found to be a
promising starting point for the construction of ocean models in[
3
7
], where is has been shown that the use of the regularized
equations yields result comparable with the unfiltered Navier–Stokes
equations at twice the space resolution.
For the special case of the shallow water equations the regularized
system reads
where &alpha is a constant which characterize the regularization and
the regularized flow velocity is obtained as the solution of
A more detailed description of the space regularized system can be
found in[
1
2
4
5
6
13].
Numerical experiments
Rossby–Haurwitz wave
We compare here the solutions obtained with the ICON-SW code for test
case 6 of[12] solving the plane
shallow water system, the time regularized system and the space
regularized system.
Four plots representing contour lines of the free surface elevation at
day 12 for the analytic solution of the barotropic vorticity equation,
the reference unfiltered shallow water solution, the time regularized
solution and the space regularized solution.
Both the time and space regularized computations use a time step which
is 2.67 times larger than the reference unfiltered computation. It
can be seen that, on the one hand, the time regularization does not
change the velocity of the Rossby–Haurwitz wave, while the space
regularization does, as observed in[13]. The space regularization also delays the
break-down of the wave pattern.
Decaying turbulence experiment
To assess the impact of the space regularization on the energy cascade
we consider a shallow water decaying turbulence experiment, where the
time evolution of an initial random flow is simulated without external
forcing.
Energy dissipation (E(t)-E(0))/E(0) during the first 30 days of
simulation and energy spectra at the final time of 30 days for a
decaying turbulence experiment for the unfiltered shallow water
equations with viscosity 891 m2/s (blue) and 446
m2/s (black) and for the space regularized shallow water
equations with viscosity 446 m2/s and &alpha=20 km (red).
It can be observed that:
- the space regularization does not enhance the overall
dissipativity of the model;
- the spectrum of the regularized system follows the unfiltered
spectrum corresponding to the same viscosity at low wave
numbers and the spectrum corresponding to twice the
viscosity at high wave numbers.
Selected bibliography
[1]
S. Chen, D. Holm, L. Margolin, and R. Zhang, Direct numerical
simulations of the Navier–Stokes alpha model, Physica D:
Nonlinear Phenomena, 133 (1999), pp. 66–83.
[2]
C. Foias, D. Holm, and E. Titi, The Navier–Stokes-alpha model of
fluid turbulence, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 152-153 (2001),
pp. 505–519.
[3]
M. Hecht, D. Holm, M. Petersen, and B. Wingate, Implementation of
the LANS-&alpha turbulence model in a primitive equation ocean model,
J. Comp. Phys., 227 (2008), pp. 5691– 5716.
[4]
D. Holm and B. Wingate, Baroclinic instabilities of the two-layer
quasigeostrophic alpha model, J. Phys. Ocean., 35 (2005), pp.
1287–1296.
[5]
E. Lunasin, S. Kurien, M. Taylor, and E. Titi, A study of the
Navier–Stokes-&alpha model for two-dimensional turbulence, J. Turb.,
8 (2007), pp. N30–.
[6]
K. Mohseni, B. Kosovic, S. Shkoller, and J. Marsden, Numerical
simulations of the Lagrangian averaged Navier–Stokes equations for
homogeneous isotropic turbulence, Phys. Fluids, 15 (2003), pp.
524–544.
[7]
M. Petersen, M. Hecht, and B. Wingate, Efficient form of the
LANS-&alpha turbulence model in a primitive-equation ocean model, J.
Comp. Phys., 227 (2008), pp. 5717–5735.
[8]
S. Reich, Linearly implicit time stepping methods for numerical
weather prediction, BIT Numerical Mathematics, 46 (2006), pp.
607–616.
[9]
S. Reich, N. Wood, and A. Staniforth, Semi-implicit methods, nonlinear
balance, and regularized equations, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 8 (2007), pp.
1–6.
[10]
A. Staniforth and N. Wood, Analysis of the response to orographic
forcing of a timestaggered semi-Lagrangian discretization of the
rotating shallow-water equations, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 132
(2006), pp. 3117–3126.
[11]
A. Staniforth, N. Wood, and S. Reich, A time-staggered semi-Lagrangian
discretization of the rotating shallow-water equations, Q. J. R.
Meteorol. Soc., 132 (2006), pp. 3107–3116.
[12]
D. Williamson, J. Drake, J. Hack, R. Jakob, and P. Swarztrauber, A
standard test set for numerical approximations to the shallow water
equations in spherical geometry, J. Comp. Phys., 102 (1992), pp.
211–224.
[13]
B. Wingate, The maximum allowable time step for the shallow water
model and its relation to time-implicit differencing, Mon. Wea.
Rev., 132 (2004), pp. 2719–2731.
(mre, 27.10.2007)